Identity free sending for a report

PhantomFox runs the identity free sending system for people reporting something. The message leaves from infrastructure that is not yours and carries no personal identity of yours, so the thing you have to say can be said without a name attached to it.

On this page
  1. Why does a personal mailbox stop people reporting?
  2. What does identity free sending offer instead?
  3. What should you understand before relying on it?

Most people who need to report something never do. The obstacle is rarely the writing; it is the return address, and the very reasonable worry about what happens once a name is attached to an uncomfortable message.

Why does a personal mailbox stop people reporting?

Because it identifies them at exactly the moment they most want not to be identified. The message that describes a problem inside an organisation is also a message that says who noticed it.

People then either say nothing at all, or say it so vaguely that whoever receives it can file the message without acting on any part of it. The information is lost in both cases, and the person who had it learns that raising something is not worth the exposure it costs.

What does identity free sending offer instead?

One message, sent from an address that is not yours, with sender privacy treated as a feature of the service rather than a trick you have to arrange. Nothing is configured, no domain is needed and no technical experience is assumed.

You write what you have to say and send it, within five minutes of arriving, with no account history to build and no throwaway mailbox to keep alive afterwards. The specifics are on anonymous sending, and the five minute path itself is on how it works.

What should you understand before relying on it?

That anonymity is a practical property rather than a magic one, and it is worth reading what it actually covers in can an anonymous email be traced before you send something consequential.

It is also worth knowing the limits: we do not send phishing, credential harvesting, malware or anything built to deceive a recipient into handing something over. Costs for a single message are on pricing.

Reporting somethingFrom your own mailboxIdentity free here
Time to sendimmediate, and identifyingfive minutes, not identifying
Your name on the messageattachedonly if you write it
Setting up a throwaway accountan hour, obvious anywaynot needed
A route for a replyyour personal inboxone you choose, or none
What stops most peoplebeing identifiednothing

People sending a professional enquiry rather than a report read anonymous sending for journalists, and anyone sending something for fun reads prank email sending for a joke. Write the message and send it once, in the words you would have used if the return address had never been the problem.

By Raze, Founder. Updated .

Tell us what you need to send